Clinical Studies:
BOLT
Citation: Rajendram R, Fraser-Bell S, Kaines A, et al. A 2-year prospective randomized controlled trial of intravitreal bevacizumab or laser therapy (BOLT) in the management of diabetic macular edema. Archives of Ophthalmology 2012; 130: 972-979.
Key Points
- BOLT was a single-center, randomized, controlled trial of bevacizumab versus macular laser for diabetic macular edema
- Bevacizumab therapy resulted in significantly better visual (mean +8.6 letters bevacizumab, -0.5 letters for laser) and anatomic outcomes, as compared to macular laser
OBJECTIVE
To compare outcomes in DME for intravitreal bevacizumab compared to macular laser
STUDY DESIGN
Single-center, randomized, controlled trial
DURATION
24 months
STUDY SUBJECTS
<Major inclusion criteria:
- DM1/DM2 with center-involved DME, at least 1 prior macular laser therapy, and no anti-VEGF therapy within the preceding 3 months
Major exclusion criteria:
- Macular ischemia
- PRP in the preceding 3 months, or planned in the subsequent 6 months
- PDR other than NVE < 1 DA without VH
RANDOMIZATION SCHEME AND INTERVENTIONS
Randomized to
- Macular (focal or grid) laser at baseline. Re-evaluation every 4 months with repeat laser per ETDRS guidelines (CSME)
- Intravitreal ranibizumab at baseline and q6w x 3, then reviewed q6wk
- If central macular thickness (CMT) > 270 µm, ranibizumab given q6w until stable* macular thickness obtained
- If CMT < 270 µm, ranibizumab only given if CMT become unstable*
* Stable CMT defined as 3 consecutive visits with CMT within 20 µm of the patients thinest recorded CMT
RESULTS
Study population
- 80 randomized, 65 completed the study (higher rate of discontinuation in the laser arm)
Visual acuity end-points
- Mean change in VA: +8.6 letters bevacizumab, -0.5 letters for laser
- Gain of ≥ 15 letters: 32% bevacizumab, 4% laser
- Loss of < 15 letters: 100% bevacizumab, 86% laser
Anatomic outcomes
- Mean reduction in CMT of 146 µm for bevacizumab and 118 µm for laser
- ETDRS severity scores (statistical analysis not provided)
- Bevacizumab: 31% improved, 66% stable, 3% worse
- Laser: 20% improved, 68% stable, 12% worse
- No significant differences noted in macular perfusion
CONCLUSIONS
Bevacizumab produced superior visual outcomes at 24 months than macular laser for diabetic macular edema