Clinical Studies:

COPERNICUS

Summarized by Joshua H. Uhr, MD

Citations:

Boyer D, Heier J, Brown DM, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor Trap-Eye for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion: six-month results of the phase 3 COPERNICUS study. Ophthalmology. 2012 May;119(5):1024-32.

Brown DM, Heier JS, Clark WL, et al. Intravitreal aflibercept injection for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion: 1-year results from the phase 3 COPERNICUS study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Mar;155(3):429-437.e7.

Heier JS, Clark WL, Boyer DS, et al. Intravitreal aflibercept injection for macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion: two-year results from the COPERNICUS study. Ophthalmology. 2014 Jul;121(7):1414-1420.e1.

Key Points

  • Intravitreal aflibercept is safe and effective for treatment of macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO)
  • Monthly aflibercept for 6 months resulted in improvement of macular edema, vision, and patient-reported visual function, as well as reduced neovascular complications compared to sham injections
  • Once transitioned to a PRN regimen with monthly monitoring (after 6 months of monthly treatment), eyes that received monthly aflibercept maintained these improvements at 1 year with a decreased injection burden. Eyes that received monthly sham injections had improvement in visual and anatomic outcomes after switching to PRN aflibercept.
  • Once transitioned to a PRN regimen with less frequent monitoring after 1 year (at least quarterly examinations), visual and anatomic gains during the first year of the study declined, indicating that less frequent monitoring may be insufficient to control the disease.
  • Objective

    To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept injections (IAI) compared to sham injections for macular edema secondary to CRVO

  • STUDY DESIGN

    Prospective, randomized, double-masked, phase 3 clinical trial


Design:


Endpoints:


STUDY SUBJECTS

Adult patients with center-involved macular edema secondary to CRVO with mean central subfield retinal thickness of 250 microns or more and ETDRS BCVA of 20/40 to 20/320


Key exclusion criteria: History of vitreoretinal surgery, current bilateral retinal vein occlusion, previous PRP or macular laser photocoagulation, age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema or retinopathy, intraocular or periocular steroids or antiangiogenic agents within three months, iris neovascularization, vitreous hemorrhage, uveitis, other causes of decreased vision, and other conditions that may interfere with interpretation of results.


RESULTS

Study population:


Results at 24 weeks:

Visual Outcomes


Anatomic Outcomes


Patient Reported Outcomes

Safety:


Results at 52 weeks:

Mean (SD) number of PRN injections between weeks 24 to 52 was 2.7 (1.7) in eyes in the IAI-randomized group (IAI + PRN) and 3.9 (2.0) in eyes in the sham injection-randomized group (sham + PRN)


Visual Outcomes


Anatomic Outcomes


Patient Reported Outcomes


Safety:


Results at 100 weeks:


Visual Outcomes


Anatomic Outcomes


Patient Reported Outcomes


Safety:


CONCLUSIONS